Startups often obtain patents to attempt to protect their intellectual property. From what I have seen, obtaining patents on core IP is considered “good housekeeping” by most VCs and startup lawyers. However, I recently saw an instance where a company decided not to file a patent on a specific piece of technology because they viewed it as a trade secret. In other words, had they filed the patent, the information could have allowed others to duplicate the functionality through alternative methods. So, they decided not to file a patent. I realize this is only one datapoint, but I wonder how often this sort of thing comes up.
You May Also Like
A Yorkshire Man sounds off on virtualization
Image by Chris Breeze via Flickr My buddy Steve Chambers has started blogging at View Yonder. Steve’s an…
5 ways to improve the tech conference experience
Attending Web 2.0 Expo and Interop this week got me thinking about the kinds of things that conference…
Soundcloud aims to be ‘data informed’ versus data driven
With all the buzz about building data driven organizations, it is good to see someone go against the…
Lean hiring tips from Eric Ries of IMVU
Eric Ries is keeping a blog called Lessons Learned where he discusses the application of formal rigor and…
VC Brand Building
We often see VCs spend a lot of time on a single blog post where they do a…
Reward Value, Not Face Time
The shift from managing butts in seats to managing inspiration can be intimidating. If you take away the…
2 comments
Rarely. The problem with trade secrets is that you are betting on your ability to actually keep something a secret. In today’s world, that’s pretty hard to do. What trade secrets imply is either that it’s exceedingly difficult to copy your process or that no one can discover it in the first place. But if someone does, that’s it – they can copy you without restriction.
The classic trade secret example is the formula for Coke. If they patented it, they’d have received protection for the length of the patent and then would be relying solely on brand power. Because no one has managed to decompile the formula (at least not perfectly), they have both unique product and brand power creating defensibility.
Especially in software these days, as fivyearstoolate notes, trade secrets is a poor IP protection mechanism. You can usually find an alternative way to do things that is sufficient. The exceptions usually only pertain to profoundly fundamental advancements to algorithms where one might, say, perform some function many times faster than we knew how to before.
And in business process patents, it’s hard to call them “fundamental” in my book…