Startups often obtain patents to attempt to protect their intellectual property. From what I have seen, obtaining patents on core IP is considered “good housekeeping” by most VCs and startup lawyers. However, I recently saw an instance where a company decided not to file a patent on a specific piece of technology because they viewed it as a trade secret. In other words, had they filed the patent, the information could have allowed others to duplicate the functionality through alternative methods. So, they decided not to file a patent. I realize this is only one datapoint, but I wonder how often this sort of thing comes up.
You May Also Like
Don’t pitch the product
Image via Wikipedia Having seen this come up a couple of times over the last couple of weeks,…
Making system administration social
Image via CrunchBase How can we make system administration more social (in the social networking sense)? And, more…
Rafer on MapReduce vs. SQL
Image by rsepulveda via Flickr I really liked this comment from Scott Rafer on the ‘MapReduce vs. SQL:…
The best guest bloggers? The answer might surprise you.
As you might guess from some of my recent posts, I’m building out content for my new career…
Love this quote from Fred Wilson on Valuation vs Ownership
We are also very much focused on what is in the best interest of the entrepreneur. You might…
Ingredients for a great startup technology conference
Image via CrunchBase Having just returned from Under The Radar where we (VMTurbo) were a presenting company, I…
2 comments
Rarely. The problem with trade secrets is that you are betting on your ability to actually keep something a secret. In today’s world, that’s pretty hard to do. What trade secrets imply is either that it’s exceedingly difficult to copy your process or that no one can discover it in the first place. But if someone does, that’s it – they can copy you without restriction.
The classic trade secret example is the formula for Coke. If they patented it, they’d have received protection for the length of the patent and then would be relying solely on brand power. Because no one has managed to decompile the formula (at least not perfectly), they have both unique product and brand power creating defensibility.
Especially in software these days, as fivyearstoolate notes, trade secrets is a poor IP protection mechanism. You can usually find an alternative way to do things that is sufficient. The exceptions usually only pertain to profoundly fundamental advancements to algorithms where one might, say, perform some function many times faster than we knew how to before.
And in business process patents, it’s hard to call them “fundamental” in my book…