<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opening the cloud computing kimono</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johngannonblog.com/2008/10/31/opening-the-cloud-computing-kimono/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johngannonblog.com/2008/10/31/opening-the-cloud-computing-kimono/</link>
	<description>Cloud computing, entrepreneurship, and venture capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andraz Tori</title>
		<link>http://johngannonblog.com/2008/10/31/opening-the-cloud-computing-kimono/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andraz Tori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jgannonwp.wordpress.com/?p=162#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

well it would definitely help users to gain confidence into could providers.

But providers can also take the other path. They can ignore the distrust and simply provide the best service for the buck. If they do it long enough and reliably they will have their track record to point to when convincing users the cloud is the (safe) way.
At least for Amazon this strategy seems to be the case.

Much the same as today users don&#039;t demand access to CPU architecture, hard disk design, etc. to be confident the components are solid when buying servers. 

Both paths are possible, but the fact is that users aren&#039;t really comfortable right now.

bye
Andraz Tori, Zemanta]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>well it would definitely help users to gain confidence into could providers.</p>
<p>But providers can also take the other path. They can ignore the distrust and simply provide the best service for the buck. If they do it long enough and reliably they will have their track record to point to when convincing users the cloud is the (safe) way.<br />
At least for Amazon this strategy seems to be the case.</p>
<p>Much the same as today users don&#8217;t demand access to CPU architecture, hard disk design, etc. to be confident the components are solid when buying servers. </p>
<p>Both paths are possible, but the fact is that users aren&#8217;t really comfortable right now.</p>
<p>bye<br />
Andraz Tori, Zemanta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

